| Preview
|
|
| Book
#25: The 5th Pacific Coast Edition |
|
| Principal
Juror: Lowery Sims, Curator in the Department of 20th
Century Art at the Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York City |
|
|
| The
forty-five artists featured in the 5th Pacific Coast
edition of New American
Paintings were selected from a group of over 600 who competed in
our 1999 Pacific Coast Competition. The competition's principal juror
was Lowery Sims, Curator in the Department of 20th Century Art at the
Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York City. Sims spent the better
part of a week carefully reviewing artists' slides and making her
selections. The result is one of the finest editions of New American Paintings to date. The book comes together in an
inexpressible way that emphasizes both the quality of the work
presented and the facility with which it was chosen. |
|
| Sims
is familiar with artists of the Pacific Coast region. While she claims
to have no preconceptions about art being produced in California, she
does have expectations about work coming out of the Pacific Northwest.
In jurying this competition, Sims was surprised by the dearth of work
with a “conspicuously Northwest feel--work which has an emphasis
placed on craft, or which makes an overt bow to Native American
art.” It is an observation with which I concur. Since the release of
our first Pacific Coast edition in 1994, there has been a marked
decrease in the amount of “Northwest-style” art that has come
through our doors. Many of the themes remain--Northwest painters still
have a palpable respect for the forces of nature and a penchant for a
type of mysticism that is often associated with Asian art--but the
context has changed. The paintings of Marc Katano offer examples of this shift.
|
|
| The
two strains of work that make themselves most strongly felt in this
edition are abstraction, and what Sims referred to as “juxtaposition
art.” The former is represented by the work of artists such as Tom
Bolles, whose stately monochrome canvases emit an inner light, and
Michelle
Ross, who combines various media and styles in order to critique
the genealogy of abstraction. |
|
| Juxtaposition
art, to use Sims' terminology, has its roots in collage, but really
came into its own during the 1980s when artists like Sigmar Polke and
David Salle popularized the format (the work of well-known
California-based artists Lezley
Saar and Carole
Caroompas offer strong examples). Because of the complexity of
such art, both on a formal and theoretical level, it tends to have
more than its fair share of critics. By its very nature, such art does
not lead a viewer to any specific reading; rather, it calls for
viewers to construct their own meaning. Often, viewers are led into an
aesthetic experience that demands an awareness of theoretical
positions surrounding topical issues such as gender, race, the body,
and sexuality. The work can be difficult, but ultimately rewarding. An
artist such as Anne
Siems can lead us into a clearer understanding of issues
surrounding femininity while simultaneously offering us a strong
aesthetic experience. |
|
| Every
curator has their own unique way of approaching a jurying project.
Sims was most interested in “getting at imagery that takes a genre
somewhere else.” I was thinking about Sims' statement when I
recently saw a painting by Marc
Trujillo at the San Francisco International Art Expo. Trujillo is
a young painter who is interested in the exterior and interior spaces
of urban America. I find his paintings to be both striking, and
somewhat insidious. On a formal level, the initial impulse to read
them as photographs is quickly undermined by the work's insistence on
laying its abstract structure bare. Yet that is not all they reveal.
These images expose the detachment of late 20th Century existence with
a subtlety that only the best art can muster. Trujillo’s paintings
not only take the genre of interior painting somewhere else, they take
us along as well. |
|
| Steven
Zevitas |